Colorado lawmakers’ ban on so-called assault weapons is finally advancing after hitting a roadblock last year
After a marathon committee listening to, Colorado Democrats’ invoice to ban the sale of semi-automatic rifles and different so-called assault weapons cleared its first hurdle early Wednesday morning and now’s poised to cross the complete Home.
The measure, Home Invoice 1292, handed the Home Judiciary Committee on a 7-3 party-line vote. The huge margin got here 11 months after the identical Democratic-majority committee narrowly voted to kill an analogous invoice.
This 12 months’s proposal would ban the sale, buy, switch or manufacture of “assault weapons.” The invoice’s definition of these firearms contains semi-automatic rifles and pistols which have fastened, large-capacity magazines or have the power to simply accept removable magazines, together with numerous different traits and different forms of high-powered firearms. The invoice doesn’t ban the possession of the weapons.
Greater than 550 individuals signed as much as testify for and towards the invoice through the Home Judiciary Committee’s listening to. It started Tuesday morning and ended simply after midnight Wednesday with the vote.
Supporters solid the invoice not as a silver bullet resolution to gun violence however as a response to the mass shootings which have plagued Colorado and the remainder of the nation for many years.
The regular drumbeat of these horrors in Colorado had been inextricably wound into the invoice and into the listening to: The panel’s vote got here two days earlier than the three-year anniversary of the Boulder King Soopers capturing that killed 10 individuals, and half of the Judiciary Committee’s members characterize cities which have had mass shootings in current reminiscence.
“We all know concerning the ever-present menace of mass shootings, public shootings, with few to zero injured survivors however fatalities within the double digits. … We all know that these proceed unchecked however for brave, data-driven coverage change,” stated Rep. Elisabeth Epps, who’s sponsoring the invoice with Rep. Tim Hernández. Each are Denver Democrats.
The measure now heads to the complete Home, the place it has a powerful probability of passing a chamber dominated by a Democratic supermajority.
If the invoice does cross the Home, that might put it on one thing of a collision course with the state Senate: The lawmaker who’s led the cost on gun reform there — Sen. Tom Sullivan, whose son Alex was among the many victims of the 2012 Aurora movie show capturing — has expressed issues concerning the efficacy of pursuing a ban concentrating on high-powered firearms. He has stated the invoice wouldn’t save as many lives as different gun laws into consideration.
The measure doesn’t but have a Senate sponsor, although Hernández stated Wednesday morning {that a} handful of senators have an interest.
A precursor to the invoice died in Home Judiciary final April, additionally on the anniversary of one other Colorado capturing: the 1999 Columbine Excessive College bloodbath.
This 12 months’s invoice was amended following the tip of testimony to permit for weapons to be handed all the way down to designated heirs after their proprietor’s loss of life. Epps and Hernández additionally modified the penalties for violating the invoice. Initially, the measure would’ve levied $250,000 and $500,000 fines. Now, the invoice makes it a petty offense to promote or buy the firearms.
Supporters stated that change was in response to issues from the general public concerning the scale of the fines. The change additionally means the invoice goes on to the Home flooring, bypassing the Home Finance Committee. That committee continues to be Democrat-controlled, however it has a tighter majority — and two of its Democratic members helped kill the invoice within the Judiciary Committee final 12 months.
Regardless of the invoice profitable preliminary approval, some committee Democrats expressed concern about particular provisions. Opponents had stated the invoice was so sweeping that it will cowl extra firearms than these which are usually thought of to be “assault weapons,” and Rep. Leslie Herod — who voted for the invoice — stated she thought some facets of the measure could also be overbroad.
Critics, together with Republican lawmakers, gun store homeowners and firearms instructors, blasted the invoice all through Tuesday’s listening to. It quantities to authorities overreach that can decimate the firearms business right here, they stated, whereas not doing sufficient to stem the tide of gun deaths.
“I like issues that work. And sadly from the attitude of public security, I don’t assume that that is going to work,” stated Rep. Gabe Evans. The Fort Lupton Republican argued that current gun-reform payments handed in Colorado haven’t borne fruit.
Opponents continuously criticized Democrats for not rising safety in colleges and different public areas which have been the websites of mass shootings. Rep. Jennifer Bacon, a Denver Democrat, countered that lawmakers have spent hundreds of thousands to raised defend colleges and bolster police forces.
That hasn’t labored, she stated.
“What this invoice does is it indicators change,” Bacon stated. “It’s a completely different factor, anticipating a unique final result. We’re the state of Columbine, of Aurora, of Littleton and King Soopers. We now have been placed on the map for these issues. So I wish to put us on the map for signaling change — that we count on to have a sane strategy to attempt to resolve for this.”
Keep up-to-date with Colorado Politics by signing up for our weekly publication, The Spot.